Re: table AM option passing

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: table AM option passing
Date: 2026-03-17 17:31:51
Message-ID: abmQByncauZoE21V@nathan
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 05:50:41PM +0100, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> We could solve this easily by adding one more boolean to each, but I
> think this is a good time to instead consolidate the API by using a
> bitmask; this also allows us not to have changingPart in the wrong place
> of the heap_delete API.
>
> So here's a patch to do that, which shouldn't change any behavior.

Seems entirely reasonable to me. I read through the patch and nothing
stood out.

> (This change is vaguely similar to b7271aa1d71a, except I used 'int'
> instead of 'bits32', to keep the interface consistent with the existing
> heap_insert() one. Maybe I should make all three take bits64 instead?
> We don't actually have that type at present, so I'd have to add that
> too.)

Why bits64 and not bits32? I must be missing something.

> While at it, I noticed that the table_insert() and heap_insert() uses
> one set of value definitions for each half of the interface; that is, in
> tableam.h we have
>
> /* "options" flag bits for table_tuple_insert */
> /* TABLE_INSERT_SKIP_WAL was 0x0001; RelationNeedsWAL() now governs */
> #define TABLE_INSERT_SKIP_FSM 0x0002
> #define TABLE_INSERT_FROZEN 0x0004
> #define TABLE_INSERT_NO_LOGICAL 0x0008
>
> and in heapam.h we have
> /* "options" flag bits for heap_insert */
> #define HEAP_INSERT_SKIP_FSM TABLE_INSERT_SKIP_FSM
> #define HEAP_INSERT_FROZEN TABLE_INSERT_FROZEN
> #define HEAP_INSERT_NO_LOGICAL TABLE_INSERT_NO_LOGICAL
> #define HEAP_INSERT_SPECULATIVE 0x0010
>
> This seems rather odd to me -- how could heapam.c have a different set
> of behaviors than what table AM uses? I find it even more weird that
> HEAP_INSERT_SPECULATIVE is defined so that as soon as some future patch
> defines the next "free" tableam.h flag value to do something new, we'll
> have a conflict. I think this would be cleaner if we removed from
> heapam.h the flags that correspond to anything in tableam.h, and use
> heapam.c and all its direct callers use the tableam.h flag definitions
> instead; and perhaps move HEAP_INSERT_SPECULATIVE to be at the other end
> of the bitmask (0x1000) -- maybe simply say in tableam.h that the first
> byte of the options int is reserved for internal use.

Probably a good idea.

--
nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2026-03-17 17:37:34 Re: index prefetching
Previous Message Andres Freund 2026-03-17 17:26:02 Re: Don't synchronously wait for already-in-progress IO in read stream