Re: Expanding HOT updates for expression and partial indexes

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Burd <greg(at)burd(dot)me>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Expanding HOT updates for expression and partial indexes
Date: 2026-03-17 15:22:02
Message-ID: ablxmmcbA_8UFjiN@nathan
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Catching up here. I see that you dropped 0002. Can you explain why that's
no longer needed?

On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 04:51:31PM -0400, Greg Burd wrote:
> Refactor executor update logic to determine which indexed columns have
> actually changed during an UPDATE operation rather than leaving this up
> to HeapDetermineColumnsInfo() in heap_update(). Finding this set of
> attributes is not heap-specific, but more general to all table AMs and
> having this information in the executor could inform other decisions
> about when index inserts are required and when they are not regardless
> of the table AM's MVCC implementation strategy.

Nice, this is a crisp motivation statement.

> Development of this feature exposed nondeterministic behavior in three
> existing tests which have been adjusted to avoid inconsistent test
> results due to tuple ordering during heap page scans.

Logistically speaking, these could be nice to get out of the way early as a
prerequisite patch so we can focus on the substance of this patch.

The rest of my comments are from a relatively quick skim. Deeper review to
follow...

> + /*
> + * Reduce the set under review to only the unmodified indexed replica
> + * identity key attributes. idx_attrs is copied (by bms_difference())
> + * not modified here.
> + */
> + attrs = bms_difference(idx_attrs, modified_idx_attrs);
> + attrs = bms_int_members(attrs, rid_attrs);
> +
> + while ((attidx = bms_next_member(attrs, attidx)) >= 0)

Could it be worth moving this loop (and some surrounding code) to a helper
function?

> - * Note: beyond this point, use oldtup not otid to refer to old tuple.
> + * NOTE: beyond this point, use oldtup not otid to refer to old tuple.

nitpick: Please remove unnecessary changes.

> @@ -5269,10 +5269,10 @@ RelationGetIndexPredicate(Relation relation)
> * in expressions (i.e., usable for FKs)
> * INDEX_ATTR_BITMAP_PRIMARY_KEY Columns in the table's primary key
> * (beware: even if PK is deferrable!)
> + * INDEX_ATTR_BITMAP_SUMMARIZED Columns only included in summarizing indexes
> * INDEX_ATTR_BITMAP_IDENTITY_KEY Columns in the table's replica identity
> * index (empty if FULL)
> - * INDEX_ATTR_BITMAP_HOT_BLOCKING Columns that block updates from being HOT
> - * INDEX_ATTR_BITMAP_SUMMARIZED Columns included in summarizing indexes
> + * INDEX_ATTR_BITMAP_INDEXED Columns referenced by indexes

Is the meaning of INDEX_ATTR_BITMAP_SUMMARIZED changing in this patch? I
see you moved it and dropped the "only".

> - Bitmapset *summarizedattrs; /* columns with summarizing indexes */
> + Bitmapset *indexedattrs; /* columns referenced by indexes */
> + Bitmapset *summarizedattrs; /* columns only in summarizing indexes */

But you added an "only" here...

--
nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrei Zubkov 2026-03-17 15:27:00 Re: Vacuum statistics
Previous Message Hüseyin Demir 2026-03-17 15:18:11 Re: Improve checks for GUC recovery_target_xid