| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Report bytes and transactions actually sent downtream |
| Date: | 2026-03-16 06:50:28 |
| Message-ID: | abeoNFvwP1LHmPOb@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 08:55:17AM +0530, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> I would post two patches
> 1. To introduce the new column sent_bytes + clarify total_bytes in the
> context of sent_bytes. We should consider this patch for committing.
Sounds to me like two patches: one for the new column, a second for
the docs of the existing columns. Could somebody send these patches?
I would be OK to look at them once posted, driving things for this CF.
> 2. Addition of filtered_bytes + sent_txns and also the clarification
> of total_bytes and total_txns in the context of the new columns. We
> will decide whether to commit the patch after 0001 is committed.
Not sure about this one, neither do I know if I would be able to look
at any proposal for this release cycle on this part. Getting 0001 out
of its box seems like a goal good enough for me, TBH.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) | 2026-03-16 06:58:52 | RE: [PATCH] Support automatic sequence replication |
| Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2026-03-16 06:47:32 | Re: Row pattern recognition |