Re: POC: rational number type (fractions)

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
To: Joe Nelson <joe(at)begriffs(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: POC: rational number type (fractions)
Date: 2020-09-04 08:12:51
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

The discussion diverged somewhat to PGXN and extensions in general, but
the consensus seems to be that this should (continue to) be an extension
rather than a core feature. I agree that as an extension this is pretty
cool. I'll mark this as rejected in the commitfest app.

Looking at the patch, it looks well-structured and commented.

- Heikki

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Konstantin Knizhnik 2020-09-04 09:29:18 Re: INSERT ON CONFLICT and RETURNING
Previous Message Jakub Wartak 2020-09-04 07:01:41 Division in dynahash.c due to HASH_FFACTOR