Re: Report bytes and transactions actually sent downtream

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Report bytes and transactions actually sent downtream
Date: 2026-03-15 22:16:56
Message-ID: abcv2M3BVzLYfdeq@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 10:39:40AM +0530, Ashutosh Sharma wrote:
> Thanks for sharing your thoughts, Michael, I had a similar idea in
> mind. I'll go ahead and implement these changes and come up with the
> new patches. Now since this is purely additive (new columns only), I'm
> thinking a single patch might suffice, Or maybe, we could split it
> into two: one that corrects the existing documentation and another
> that introduces the new fields for displaying downstream bytes sent
> and some other information related to this.

Thanks. We'd better move forward quickly with this one based on the
current calendar, still it would be good to hear from Ashutosh Bapat
and double-check with him.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2026-03-15 22:27:40 Re: gen_guc_tables improvements
Previous Message Tom Lane 2026-03-15 22:13:30 Re: Change copyObject() to use typeof_unqual