Re: Defend against -ffast-math in meson builds

From: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Defend against -ffast-math in meson builds
Date: 2026-03-12 10:26:41
Message-ID: abKU4cLSlRu6v3J+@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 01:48:31PM -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2026-03-11 12:45:55 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > So no, I don't wanna support this. But maybe we should move the
> > code-level tests out of the datetime files and into utils/float.h
> > or some such place.
>
> I think it's probably better to have it in a .c file (maybe float.c), I could
> kinda imagine some extension intentionally enabling -ffast-math, because it
> does something numerically intensive where the incorrectness doesn't matter.

I think that you have a good point about the extension. That said a .h file
could also prevent the extension to make use of -ffast-math "accidentally".

And if they really want it, I think that they could compile the extension with
"-ffast-math -U__FAST_MATH__" to make it work. I just tested it and that works
but now that I write it that looks like an odd combination, so a .c file looks
better.

What do you think?

Regards,

--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2026-03-12 10:38:11 Re: POC: PLpgSQL FOREACH IN JSON ARRAY
Previous Message Viktor Holmberg 2026-03-12 10:15:56 Re: support fast default for domain with constraints