Re: [PATCH] proposal for regexp_count, regexp_instr, regexp_substr and regexp_replace

From: Gilles Darold <gilles(at)darold(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net, er(at)xs4all(dot)nl
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proposal for regexp_count, regexp_instr, regexp_substr and regexp_replace
Date: 2021-08-03 11:26:48
Message-ID: ab3f3424-4969-906d-0932-800900b4647a@darold.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Le 03/08/2021 à 11:45, Gilles Darold a écrit :
> Actually I just found that the regexp_like() function doesn't support
> the start parameter which is something we should support. I saw that
> Oracle do not support it but DB2 does and I think we should also
> support it. I will post a new version of the patch once it is done.

Here is a new version of the patch that adds the start parameter to
regexp_like() function but while I'm adding support to this parameter it
become less obvious for me that we should implement it. However feel
free to not use this version if you think that adding the start
parameter has no real interest.

Best regards,

--
Gilles Darold

Attachment Content-Type Size
v7-0001-regexp-foo-functions.patch text/x-patch 62.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker 2021-08-03 11:48:38 [PATCH] Tab completion for ALTER TABLE … ADD …
Previous Message Andrey Lepikhov 2021-08-03 11:12:01 Re: Extra code in commit_ts.h