Re: Fixes inconsistent behavior in vacuum when it processes multiple relations

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, shihao zhong <zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fixes inconsistent behavior in vacuum when it processes multiple relations
Date: 2026-03-20 19:39:11
Message-ID: ab2iXwhRe3fFNPfp@nathan
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 12:27:49PM -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
> Why wasn't it enough to add const markers and keep passing by pointer?

IIRC the idea was to prevent similar problems in the future. To avoid the
extra #includes, we could instead use the back-patched version (e.g.,
commit 661643deda).

--
nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Melanie Plageman 2026-03-20 19:50:59 Re: Don't synchronously wait for already-in-progress IO in read stream
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2026-03-20 19:33:18 Re: pg_waldump: support decoding of WAL inside tarfile