| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Cc: | Alexander Kuzmenkov <akuzmenkov(at)tigerdata(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin(dot)bonnefoy(at)datadoghq(dot)com>, Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Fix uninitialized xl_running_xacts padding |
| Date: | 2026-03-22 06:50:06 |
| Message-ID: | ab-RHkucjKUFXgY3@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 02:18:45PM +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> I think if you use "BEGIN; INSERT ...; ROLLBACK;" to generate the dead
> tuples instead of DELETE, it will not be sensitive to concurrent snapshots
> like that.
Nice trick, this makes the test stable. I have reused it and applied
this part to take care of the coverage hole.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2026-03-22 08:50:31 | Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall |
| Previous Message | John Naylor | 2026-03-22 05:26:24 | Re: vectorized CRC on ARM64 |