| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Doc: remove some long-obsolete information from installation.sgm |
| Date: | 2019-09-06 14:20:14 |
| Message-ID: | aaa4e5d2-ed20-d4c7-0e91-46b9723ea1fe@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers |
On 2019-09-06 15:28, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> On 2019-09-01 23:34, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> So did the old wording, it seemed to me. I'm happy to remove the sentence
>>> altogether if there's no reason to be pushing people away from MinGW.
>>> Should we also rethink the sentence I added at the top of the chapter,
>>> pointing Windows people to chapter 17?
>
>> Yeah, I suggest this:
>> ...
>
> Hm, I'm tempted to also drop the sentence about the "ready-made installer"
> then. It doesn't particularly belong here, and the only way to read it
> is as a nudge to not use the MinGW build process.
Agreed, it seems out of place there.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2019-09-06 14:25:41 | Re: pgsql: Doc: remove some long-obsolete information from installation.sgm |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-09-06 13:37:46 | Re: pgsql: Doc: remove some long-obsolete information from installation.sgm |