Re: DOCS - pg_walsummary typo?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DOCS - pg_walsummary typo?
Date: 2026-03-02 07:17:23
Message-ID: aaU5g3vGc3H9EkH6@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 16, 2026 at 08:13:26AM -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2026 at 10:40 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I found what seems to be a typo in the pg_walsummary description. I
>> guess that "with" was supposed to say "within", but IMO just "in" is
>> fine.
>
> +1

Yep, the wording seems strange and switching this single word is an
improvement. Will fix later, if there are no objections.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message jian he 2026-03-02 07:20:24 Re: pg_dumpall --roles-only interact with other options
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2026-03-02 07:15:30 Re: BUG: Former primary node might stuck when started as a standby