Re: Add starelid, attnum to pg_stats and leverage this in pg_dump

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Add starelid, attnum to pg_stats and leverage this in pg_dump
Date: 2026-03-09 21:04:05
Message-ID: aa81xZp421DSkHiW@nathan
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 03:28:40PM -0400, Corey Huinker wrote:
> Presently, I don't think we make any changes to pg_dump, unless Nathan
> feels strongly that we should. If and when the need for oid-based fetching
> of extended stats becomes necessary, we'll at least have a couple versions
> where the catalog already had the oids handy.

That's fine with me.

--
nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zsolt Parragi 2026-03-09 21:55:22 Re: Stack-based tracking of per-node WAL/buffer usage
Previous Message Matheus Alcantara 2026-03-09 20:49:35 Re: pg_upgrade fails when extension_control_path is used