On Sun, Mar 08, 2026 at 11:05:32PM +0800, cca5507 wrote:
> Attach a small patch.
You are right, this needs to consider the pointer variable as
volatile, as done in your patch, and not treat as volatile what is
pointed at. This comes from 2e947217474c, as of HEAD. I'll take care
of it later. The same business has been fixed in xml2 as of
93001888d85c.
--
Michael