Re: Improve verification of recovery_target_timeline GUC.

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgbackrest(dot)org>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improve verification of recovery_target_timeline GUC.
Date: 2026-02-20 03:38:35
Message-ID: aZfXO97jSQaTTlfD@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 20, 2026 at 03:25:30AM +0000, David Steele wrote:
> I noticed that when you replaced UINT_MAX with PG_UINT32_MAX you missed one
> instance. Fixed in the attached.

Added pgsql-hackers in CC for awareness, with your proposed patch
attached, David.

It looks so. Will fix, thanks!
--
Michael

Attachment Content-Type Size
uint32.patch text/plain 582 bytes

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2026-02-20 04:35:04 Re: pgstat include expansion
Previous Message David Steele 2026-02-20 03:10:34 Re: Return pg_control from pg_backup_stop().