| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | zhangyc0706(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #19415: Spelling error about 'vacuume' in zh_CN.po |
| Date: | 2026-02-25 16:05:39 |
| Message-ID: | aZ8d0xPF1ojcsz3h@momjian.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 06:22:57AM +0000, PG Bug reporting form wrote:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference: 19415
> Logged by: yuanchao zhang
> Email address: zhangyc0706(at)gmail(dot)com
> PostgreSQL version: 18.1
> Operating system: windows 10
> Description:
>
> I'm doing some testing in PostgreSQL 18, trying to get transaction IDs to
> exceed 4.2 billion,
> but I encountered the following error:
> "警告: 带有OID为4的数据库必须在4293966794个事务中进行清理(vacuume)."
> (Because I'm using a Chinese-language environment, the error message is in
> Chinese.
> I checked the source code and found the corresponding English error:
> 'database with OID %u must be vacuumed within %u transactions'.)
>
> The error itself is not problematic, but I believe there is a spelling error
> in the word "vacuume".
> Therefore, I searched the PostgreSQL 18 source code for this word and found
> four similar instances,
> all appearing in the 'src\backend\po\zh_CN.po' file.
> I'm unsure how to better fix this—should I change it to `vacuumed` or simply
> remove it?
> Therefore, I'm submitting this feedback in the hope that this issue can be
> fixed in a future version.
You should send this to pgsql-translators(at)postgresql(dot)org or see
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/NLS
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sandeep Thakkar | 2026-02-25 16:07:36 | Re: PostgreSQL MSI ignores --datadir flag during minor upgrade on Windows |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2026-02-25 15:36:13 | Re: Major Version Upgrade failure due to orphan roles entries in catalog |