Re: Warning-suppression fixes we ought to back-patch

From: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Warning-suppression fixes we ought to back-patch
Date: 2026-02-25 10:21:57
Message-ID: aZ7NRaiL9tp0NegO@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 11:24:45AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> 8f1791c61 Fix some cases of indirectly casting away const.

Worth to also back-patch 9f7565c6c2d (as 8f1791c61 follow up)?

Regards,

--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2026-02-25 10:22:26 Re: Options to control remote transactions’ access/deferrable modes in postgres_fdw
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2026-02-25 10:21:17 Re: pg_basebackup: removed an unnecessary use of memset in FindStreamingStart