Re: basic_archive lost archive_directory

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, Олег Самойлов <splarv(at)ya(dot)ru>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
Subject: Re: basic_archive lost archive_directory
Date: 2026-02-11 21:14:15
Message-ID: aYzxJy0icsGM1A6u@nathan
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 10:06:25AM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> As I mentioned upthread, IMHO we should simply remove the existence check
> from the GUC check hook. basic_archive must already be written to handle
> the archive directory disappearing at any moment, so we should be able to
> rely on it without the extra stat().

Concretely, like the attached.

--
nathan

Attachment Content-Type Size
v1-0001-basic_archive-Allow-archive-directory-to-be-missi.patch text/plain 1.6 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message surya poondla 2026-02-12 00:34:25 Re: Two issues with REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY
Previous Message surya poondla 2026-02-11 19:56:12 Re: Two issues with REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY