Re: Replace literal 0 values with the appropriate Invalid* constants

Hi,

On Thu, Feb 12, 2026 at 07:51:18PM -0500, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2026-02-12 10:15:06 +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> > There are some places where we are using literal 0 instead of the proper Invalid*
> > constant.
> >
> > I think it's better to use the proper constant instead: It improves code clarity
> > by making it explicit that these are invalid values rather than ambiguous zero
> > literals.
>
> I think we should reject these and other similar patches, they generate way
> more noise than they are improving the code. If you edit the code for other
> reasons and update the initialization in the course of that, ok, but these
> wholesale searches for initializing with 0 use up bandwidth that we could use
> for much more worthwhile things.

Thanks for sharing your thoughts! I'll keep using Coccinelle but only for things
that provide more "added" value to the code.

Though I thought that for things like the ones in this thread (that I agree don't
provide a lot of added value), proceding like:

> > (and that could be merged at an interval of choice if we feel that's too much noise).

could have been a valuable option.

Regards,

--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com