On Fri, Feb 13, 2026 at 12:55:15AM +0000, David Steele wrote:
> Reluctantly I have to agree to not back patch this. I'm not sure how this
> change would break existing recovery processes but experience tells me that
> it probably would.
>
> Instead -- I wonder if we could add a warning in the back branches?
I am not convinced that going down to that is really necessary based
on the lack of complaints, and it could even be qualified as
disturbing for existing cases as well? Let's leave that as a
HEAD-only change.
--
Michael