Re: Safer hash table initialization macro

From: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Safer hash table initialization macro
Date: 2026-01-26 14:41:20
Message-ID: aXd9EPasAteCd4+A@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 11:50:34AM +0100, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
> On Mon Jan 26, 2026 at 11:26 AM CET, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> > I can still see it. If I apply from 0001 to 0004 and compile, I see it. It looks
> > like it's fixed in 0005:
>
> Ugh, you're right. I had ammended that fix to the wrong commit. Fixed
> now.

Yeah, sounds good, thanks!

Regards,

--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zsolt Parragi 2026-01-26 14:47:49 Re: docs: clarify ALTER TABLE behavior on partitioned tables
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2026-01-26 14:08:39 Re: Exit walsender before confirming remote flush in logical replication