Re: Add WALRCV_CONNECTING state to walreceiver

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add WALRCV_CONNECTING state to walreceiver
Date: 2026-01-22 08:16:11
Message-ID: aXHcyyVzREVgQQdm@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 03:34:32PM +0800, Chao Li wrote:
> “Is not running” appears twice in this short paragraph, looks redundant. Suggestion:
> ```
> <literal>stopped</literal>: WAL receiver process is not running.
> This state is normally not visible because the view returns no row in this case.
> ```

I have removed this part at the end, see 1a1e733b6231. Let's see
later about the second episode of this saga.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chao Li 2026-01-22 08:22:24 Re: Fix accidentally cast away qualifiers
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2026-01-22 08:08:40 Re: Add WALRCV_CONNECTING state to walreceiver