Re: Optional skipping of unchanged relations during ANALYZE?

From: Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>
To: VASUKI M <vasukianand0119(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ilia Evdokimov <ilya(dot)evdokimov(at)tantorlabs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Optional skipping of unchanged relations during ANALYZE?
Date: 2026-01-21 09:44:45
Message-ID: aXCgDaz9y2ssA84N@msg.df7cb.de
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Re: VASUKI M
> VACUUM(SMART);

IMHO it was a historical mistake to combine VACUUM and ANALYZE into a
single command. We should not add any more options on that
combination. If people want to pass options to ANALYZE, they should
call ANALYZE and not VACUUM.

Christoph

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message VASUKI M 2026-01-21 09:47:44 Re: Optional skipping of unchanged relations during ANALYZE?
Previous Message VASUKI M 2026-01-21 09:37:01 Re: Optional skipping of unchanged relations during ANALYZE?