Re: Extended Statistics set/restore/clear functions.

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tender Wang <tndrwang(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Extended Statistics set/restore/clear functions.
Date: 2026-01-15 09:35:33
Message-ID: aWi05ceIjnxWXNt9@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 04:57:00PM +0800, Chao Li wrote:
> 4 - Given comment 1, no test fails. I think that’s because all test
> cases use inherited = false. Maybe we need a test case for inherited
> = true.

Yeah, I was planning to add one but ran out of steam today. I should
have mentioned that earlier.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Anthonin Bonnefoy 2026-01-15 09:40:37 Re: Add missing JIT inline pass for llvm>=17
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2026-01-15 09:33:59 Re: Extended Statistics set/restore/clear functions.