Re: Resetting recovery target parameters in pg_createsubscriber

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Andrey Rudometov <unlimitedhikari(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alena Vinter <dlaaren8(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ilyasov Ian <ianilyasov(at)outlook(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Resetting recovery target parameters in pg_createsubscriber
Date: 2025-12-25 01:50:16
Message-ID: aUyYWMhp7htMWmNg@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 24, 2025 at 06:12:24PM +0700, Andrey Rudometov wrote:
> As discussion here came to a halt, I want to add some
> (counter)arguments, which may or may not make Michael's
> proposal sound preferable to you.

If somebody could post a refreshed patch set that addresses the
comments raised until now, I would be happy to look at it and get
something done for this release.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chao Li 2025-12-25 02:40:02 Re: Switch buffile.c/h to use pgoff_t
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2025-12-25 01:30:37 Re: [Proposal] Expose internal MultiXact member count function for efficient monitoring