Quick Links

Re: [PATCH] Fix ARM64/MSVC atomic memory ordering issues on Win11 by adding explicit DMB ?barriers

From:	Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To:	Greg Burd <greg(at)burd(dot)me>
Cc:	Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] Fix ARM64/MSVC atomic memory ordering issues on Win11 by adding explicit DMB ?barriers
Date:	2025-12-15 21:38:49
Message-ID:	aUB_6ZNFRtjM7FVS@nathan
Views:	Whole Thread \| Raw Message \| Download mbox \| Resend email
Thread:
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 12:27:25PM -0500, Greg Burd wrote:
> Got it, fixed in v9.

I tried to rearrange the s_lock.h changes to make it more obvious what is
specific to AArch64. WDYT?

--
nathan

Attachment	Content-Type	Size
v10-0001-Enable-the-Microsoft-Windows-ARM64-MSVC-platform.patch	text/plain	5.2 KB

In response to

Re: [PATCH] Fix ARM64/MSVC atomic memory ordering issues on Win11 by adding explicit DMB ?barriers at 2025-12-15 17:27:25 from Greg Burd

Responses

Re: [PATCH] Fix ARM64/MSVC atomic memory ordering issues on Win11 by adding explicit DMB ?barriers at 2025-12-15 22:32:36 from Andres Freund
Re: [PATCH] Fix ARM64/MSVC atomic memory ordering issues on Win11 by adding explicit DMB ?barriers at 2025-12-16 12:37:10 from Greg Burd

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Greg Burd	2025-12-15 21:46:11	Re: Expanding HOT updates for expression and partial indexes
Previous Message	Melanie Plageman	2025-12-15 21:29:03	Re: eliminate xl_heap_visible to reduce WAL (and eventually set VM on-access)