Re: Safer hash table initialization macro

From: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Safer hash table initialization macro
Date: 2025-12-09 14:15:30
Message-ID: aTgvAif5rDEILQQF@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Tue, Dec 09, 2025 at 11:45:11AM +0100, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Dec 2025 at 08:27, Bertrand Drouvot
> <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Thanks for this patch series!
>
> To clarify: Does that mean +1 from you on the proposed API?

Yeah, I think the hash table API needs improvement. I did not look at all the
details of your patches, but from what I have seen I think your API proposal
make sense.

Regards,

--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2025-12-09 14:37:39 Re: [PATCH] Update comment in nodeBitmapHeapscan.c
Previous Message Anton Haglund 2025-12-09 14:02:38 Re: [PATCH] Update comment in nodeBitmapHeapscan.c