Re: Improve error reporting in 027_stream_regress test

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Brandon Tat <brandontat6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: Improve error reporting in 027_stream_regress test
Date: 2025-12-06 05:45:13
Message-ID: aTPC6XmjisDaVWaU@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 05, 2025 at 10:50:25AM +0300, Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> I liked your version more. My only complaint was removing the
> line_count argument but we can easily add it back when we need it.

Yes, I am not sure about that at this stage. It would be good to see
more use cases for this new API before deciding anything, to let the
callers of this new routine enforce their fate.

> You are right, thank you for handling that.

Okay, applied then. That should close this thread.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Lakhin 2025-12-06 06:00:01 Re: Issues with ON CONFLICT UPDATE and REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Previous Message Dilip Kumar 2025-12-06 04:50:14 Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication