Re: [buildfarm related] Machines gcc experimental failed test_lfind

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [buildfarm related] Machines gcc experimental failed test_lfind
Date: 2025-11-26 16:21:58
Message-ID: aScpJmdjIAe9V2A6@nathan
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 26, 2025 at 11:10:31AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Anyway, this is exactly the sort of analysis that we shouldn't
> be doing.

Well, I wanted to be sure we weren't accidentally depending on undefined
behavior, like what we fixed in commit 43da394. Something like that seemed
within the realm of possibility.

--
nathan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker 2025-11-26 16:22:50 Re: The pgperltidy diffs in HEAD
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2025-11-26 16:19:40 Re: The pgperltidy diffs in HEAD