Re: RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3 support

From: Nico Williams <nico(at)cryptonector(dot)com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, * Neustradamus * <neustradamus(at)hotmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "alexey(dot)melnikov(at)isode(dot)com" <alexey(dot)melnikov(at)isode(dot)com>
Subject: Re: RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3 support
Date: 2025-11-21 17:38:41
Message-ID: aSCjoYKySH1iNCbz@ubby
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 21, 2025 at 06:24:07PM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > On 21 Nov 2025, at 17:38, Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > In the past, we've said that we're going to wait for published RFCs,
> > and I think that's served us well.
>
> I am a strong supporter of this strategy.

+1

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Melanie Plageman 2025-11-21 17:52:38 Re: Buffer locking is special (hints, checksums, AIO writes)
Previous Message Nico Williams 2025-11-21 17:38:04 Re: RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3 support