Re: RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3 support

From: Nico Williams <nico(at)cryptonector(dot)com>
To: * Neustradamus * <neustradamus(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3 support
Date: 2025-11-21 17:32:02
Message-ID: aSCiEhBubtdA+ldS@ubby
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 08:58:54PM +0000, * Neustradamus * wrote:
> - XEP-0388: Extensible SASL Profile: https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0388.html
> - XEP-0440: SASL Channel-Binding Type Capability: https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0440.html
> - XEP-0474: SASL SCRAM Downgrade Protection: https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0474.html
> - XEP-0480: SASL Upgrade Tasks: https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0480.html

Why are XEPs relevant to PG?

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nico Williams 2025-11-21 17:38:04 Re: RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3 support
Previous Message Nico Williams 2025-11-21 17:30:00 Re: RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3 support