Re: [Patch] Windows relation extension failure at 2GB and 4GB

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Bryan Green <dbryan(dot)green(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Patch] Windows relation extension failure at 2GB and 4GB
Date: 2025-12-02 03:12:28
Message-ID: aS5ZHJfJy6d9-RtD@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 01, 2025 at 10:05:52PM -0500, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2025-12-02 12:02:39 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> buffile.h and buffile.c still have traces of off_t.
>
> Oh, I was interpreting buffer as bufmgr.c...

Sorry for being rather unclear here ;D
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Corey Huinker 2025-12-02 03:16:25 Re: Is there value in having optimizer stats for joins/foreignkeys?
Previous Message Xuneng Zhou 2025-12-02 03:08:01 Re: Implement waiting for wal lsn replay: reloaded