Re: Improve error reporting in 027_stream_regress test

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: Improve error reporting in 027_stream_regress test
Date: 2025-11-16 22:46:08
Message-ID: aRpUMHdBvbohoz-J@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Nov 15, 2025 at 04:58:17PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I just marked the CF entry for this thread committed [1], because I
> saw that the cfbot was reporting its patch-of-record as committed.

Thanks. I've had this item in my bucket of things to do for some time
but got drifted away. I am not sure if I would be able to come back
to it in the next couple of weeks, either.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2025-11-16 23:11:52 Re: pgsql: Drop unnamed portal immediately after execution to completion
Previous Message Greg Burd 2025-11-16 18:53:09 Re: Expanding HOT updates for expression and partial indexes