Re: Extended Statistics set/restore/clear functions.

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Subject: Re: Extended Statistics set/restore/clear functions.
Date: 2025-11-12 07:53:50
Message-ID: aRQ9DlurbzZ5EObD@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 01:47:33AM -0500, Corey Huinker wrote:
>> Thanks for the new patch. And FWIW I disagree with this approach:
>> cleanup and refactoring pieces make more sense if done first, as these
>> lead to less code churn in the final result. So... I've begun to put
>> my hands on the patch set. The whole has been restructured a bit, as
>> per the attached. Patch 0001 to 0004 feel OK here, these include two
>> code moves and the two output functions:
>> - Two new files for adt/, that I'm planning to apply soon as a
>> separate cleanup.
>
> Agreed, 0001-0004 all look good.

Applied 0001 and 0002 for now.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2025-11-12 07:58:43 Re: [Patch] Windows relation extension failure at 2GB and 4GB
Previous Message Yugo Nagata 2025-11-12 07:52:16 Re: Make PQgetResult() not return NULL on out-of-memory error