| From: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> |
| Cc: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_utility ? |
| Date: | 2025-11-20 09:31:59 |
| Message-ID: | aR7gD5RZzwYwzopK@msg.df7cb.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Re: Andreas Karlsson
> > Perhaps pg_util? ("pg" is taken by that classic pager thingy.)
>
> I like the name pg_util. In the MySQL world it is called mysqladmin, which
> is a does of pg_ctl and tools like createdb.
"pg_adm" would also be a candidate. (Or is that too close to pgadmin?)
> Maybe pg_util should only be for tools which connect to PostgreSQL over the
> TCP (or a unix socket) while the all other tools, which need access to the
> data directory, should have their own executables?
That would be the idea, yes.
Christoph
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2025-11-20 09:38:49 | Re: 10% drop in code line count in PG 17 |
| Previous Message | Akshay Joshi | 2025-11-20 09:27:05 | Re: [PATCH] Add pg_get_policy_ddl() function to reconstruct CREATE POLICY statement |