| From: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Quan Zongliang <quanzongliang(at)yeah(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Consistently use the XLogRecPtrIsInvalid() macro |
| Date: | 2025-11-19 17:47:26 |
| Message-ID: | aR4CroIPon7zoJe/@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 12:27:30PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 11:49 AM Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> wrote:
> > > I'm rather late to the party here, but for what it's worth, I don't
> > > really think this was a good idea. Anyone who wants to write
> > > out-of-core code that works in the back-branches must still write it
> > > the old way, or it will potentially fail on older minor releases.
> >
> > No, they don't need to. Thus far, they can still keep their code the
> > way it is.
>
> True, but if they write any new code, and care about it compiling with
> older minor releases, this is a potential pitfall.
Why given that 06edbed4786 has been back patched through 13?
Regards,
--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2025-11-19 17:50:37 | Re: CREATE/ALTER PUBLICATION improvements for syntax synopsis |
| Previous Message | Jacob Champion | 2025-11-19 17:46:22 | Re: Post-release followup: pg_add_size_overflow() |