Re: Improved TAP tests by replacing sub-optimal uses of ok() with better Test::More functions

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Sadhuprasad Patro <b(dot)sadhu(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improved TAP tests by replacing sub-optimal uses of ok() with better Test::More functions
Date: 2025-11-04 07:03:53
Message-ID: aQmlWcM3IRz7YaA0@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 04, 2025 at 12:20:03PM +0530, Sadhuprasad Patro wrote:
> Is this looks fine to you?

I'm pretty sure that this should also be made aware of an optional
offset, so as the server logs could be compared based on a sub-set of
the logs generated, and not a whole file.

> Will share a new patch soon with this content...

Thanks!
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2025-11-04 07:13:55 Re: Extended Statistics set/restore/clear functions.[
Previous Message Sadhuprasad Patro 2025-11-04 06:50:03 Re: Improved TAP tests by replacing sub-optimal uses of ok() with better Test::More functions