| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Filip Janus <fjanus(at)redhat(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Subject: | Re: Channel binding for post-quantum cryptography |
| Date: | 2025-11-02 00:30:18 |
| Message-ID: | aQamGjNsYTgsSmhD@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 10:26:01AM +0100, Filip Janus wrote:
> While fixing the actual issue will take some time, I’ve fixed the requested
> test.
> Since I’m still quite new to the PG community, would it make sense to
> propose a patch that only adds the test?
Yes, we could add a test that tracks the current behavior first. That
would be half of the job already done until we figure out the details
of the implementation, changing the test once we know which approach
makes the most sense.
Not sure how the others feel about that, but I'm OK with that.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Paul Ohlhauser | 2025-11-02 00:55:39 | Re: [PG19-3 PATCH] Don't ignore passfile |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2025-11-02 00:09:55 | Re: [PATCH] Add error message for out-of-memory in passwordFromFile() |