Re: pgsql: doc: rewrite random_page_cost description

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: doc: rewrite random_page_cost description
Date: 2025-10-31 15:37:18
Message-ID: aQTXrmehrxJkIMFA@momjian.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 11:12:20PM +0000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> doc: rewrite random_page_cost description
>
> This removes some of the specifics of how the default was set, and adds
> a mention of latency as a reason the value is lower than the storage
> hardware might suggest. It still mentions caching.
>
> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKAnmmK_nSPYr53LobUwQD59a-8U9GEC3XGJ43oaTYJq5nAOkw@mail.gmail.com
>
> Backpatch-through: 13
>
> Branch
> ------
> master
>
> Details
> -------
> https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/3896e861b348f282813f165f60fb8ab3342114c6
>
> Modified Files
> --------------
> doc/src/sgml/config.sgml | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

My apologies that I used the incorrect "Discussion" URL above. It
should have been:

https://postgr.es/m/80d8b470-50fe-40df-b692-3292dd015595@vondra.me

I had two random_page_cost threads in my mailbox and unfortunately used
the older one.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Álvaro Herrera 2025-10-31 17:08:25 pgsql: pg_createsubscriber: Fix error complaining about the wrong thing
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2025-10-31 09:53:38 pgsql: Mark function arguments of type "Datum *" as "const Datum *" whe