| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Kai Wagner <kai(dot)wagner(at)percona(dot)com>, Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com>, Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com>, "Clay Jackson (cjackson)" <Clay(dot)Jackson(at)quest(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Enquiry about TDE with PgSQL |
| Date: | 2025-11-08 03:25:41 |
| Message-ID: | aQ64NQtldFxpsyJ_@momjian.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Nov 3, 2025 at 09:23:33PM -0800, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> On 11/3/25 18:05, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 3, 2025 at 07:42:06PM +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2025-11-03 at 11:56 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > The problem with the Percona extension is it seems like it was developed
> > > > mostly/all by Percona employees, meaning development was driven/steered
> > > > by Percona, and there was insufficient feedback from the community for
> > > > it to be polished enough to be a general community solution.
>
> >
> > Uh, people will say that if the solution is not 100% secure in its
> > coverage, it is much less useful and therefore not worth it.
> >
>
> In a different realm you have been there before and it worked out:
>
> https://momjian.us/main/blogs/pgblog/2010.html#May_12_2010
Yes, pg_upgrade was a hard one too, and it took a long time be accepted,
so there is hope.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2025-11-08 16:34:25 | Re: Index corruption issue after migration from RHEL 7 to RHEL 9 (PostgreSQL 11 streaming replication) |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2025-11-07 15:48:18 | Re: Enquiry about long-running queries |