Re: contrib/sepgsql regression tests have been broken for months

On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 05:36:01PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> So, okay, that's a perfectly respectable thing to do, and I can't
> really fault Michael or Jian for not having tested its effects on
> sepgsql. But how come it took this long to notice?

Oops. I would have taken care of that should I have known... I check
the compilation of sepgsql, but the tests require dependencies that
are too heavy so it has always been some copy-paste operation when the
buildfarm got angry on this test suite (combined with hopes to not
break the tests).

> I think that rhinoceros is the only BF member testing with
> --with-selinux.

I recall so, yes.

> Anyway, we seem to need the attached in v18 and HEAD,
> and we really ought to get BF coverage going again.

Thanks for sending a patch (and 0758111f5d35)!
--
Michael