| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | John H <johnhyvr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla <srinath2133(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, wenhui qiu <qiuwenhuifx(at)gmail(dot)com>, Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Kwan <justinpkwan(at)outlook(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, vignesh ravichandran <admin(at)viggy28(dot)dev>, "hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi" <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Subject: | Re: Making pg_rewind faster |
| Date: | 2025-10-24 08:38:37 |
| Message-ID: | aPs7DU0e7TmBbW2v@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 04:56:33PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I was just wondering about some queries on the new standby once we are
> done with the rewind. But after sleeping on it, I'd be happy with
> just the set of tests we have: the debug output checks, the size
> checks pre and post-rewind, and no mtime.
So, I am coming down to the attached (minus the commit message) after
more edits and adjustments. It's Friday evening here, and I am not
planning to do more today and to take bets on the buildfarm, even if
the CI is OK.
--
Michael
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v13-0001-Avoid-copying-WAL-segments-before-divergence-to-.patch | text/x-diff | 12.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Arseniy Mukhin | 2025-10-24 08:55:02 | Re: LISTEN/NOTIFY bug: VACUUM sets frozenxid past a xid in async queue |
| Previous Message | Andrew Kim | 2025-10-24 08:09:56 | Re: Proposal for enabling auto-vectorization for checksum calculations |