Re: fix type of infomask parameter in static inline functions

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org
Subject: Re: fix type of infomask parameter in static inline functions
Date: 2025-10-22 21:48:34
Message-ID: aPlRMqKFncZ0XInW@nathan
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 05:16:54PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> +1 for changing, but -1 for back-patching. Unless you're itching
> for reasons to update .abi-compliance-history. But if there's no
> live bug, that seems like make-work.

Yeah, makes sense. Committed, thanks for looking.

--
nathan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2025-10-22 21:51:26 Re: IO in wrong state on riscv64
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2025-10-22 21:23:03 Re: POC: enable logical decoding when wal_level = 'replica' without a server restart