| From: | Mark Wong <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Akshay Joshi <akshay(dot)joshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Add pg_get_policy_ddl() function to reconstruct CREATE POLICY statement |
| Date: | 2025-10-27 16:45:10 |
| Message-ID: | aP-hllbRdgqbmB8L@ltdrgnflg2 |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi everyone,
On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 01:47:53PM +0530, Akshay Joshi wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 10:55 PM Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have reviewed this patch before and provided a number of comments that
> have been addressed by Akshay (so I encourage you to list my name and
> this address in a Reviewed-by trailer line in the commit message). One
> thing I had not noticed is that while this function has a "pretty" flag,
> it doesn't use it to pass anything to pg_get_expr_worker()'s prettyFlags
> argument, and I think it should -- probably just
>
> prettyFlags = GET_PRETTY_FLAGS(pretty);
>
> same as pg_get_querydef() does.
Kinda sorta similar thought, I've noticed some existing functions like
pg_get_constraintdef make the "pretty" flag optional, so I'm wondering
if that scheme is also preferred here.
I've attached a small diff to the original
0001-Add-pg_get_policy_ddl-function-to-reconstruct-CREATE.patch to
illustrate the additional work to follow suit, if so desired.
Regards,
Mark
--
Mark Wong <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com>
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| for-optional-pretty.diff | text/plain | 4.6 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vitaly Davydov | 2025-10-27 16:59:51 | RE: Newly created replication slot may be invalidated by checkpoint |
| Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2025-10-27 16:23:12 | Re: display hot standby state in psql prompt |