From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
Cc: | Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Ayush Vatsa <ayushvatsa1810(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Clarification on Role Access Rights to Table Indexes |
Date: | 2025-10-15 15:39:17 |
Message-ID: | aO_AJd3Au9xmSwjD@nathan |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 10:01:37AM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> If we start with an OID, what's the right way to do these kinds of
> checks? Could we do an ACL check, then lock it, then do an ACL check
> again to catch OID wraparound?
I tried something like this upthread [0]. My feeling was that this was a
lot of complexity for not a lot of gain. Perhaps it's still worth doing,
though.
[0] https://postgr.es/m/aOgmi6avE6qMw_6t%40nathan
--
nathan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2025-10-15 17:54:21 | Re: Clarification on Role Access Rights to Table Indexes |
Previous Message | Dominique Devienne | 2025-10-15 09:51:32 | Re: Option on `postgres` CLI to shutdown when there are no more active connections? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jacob Champion | 2025-10-15 15:46:28 | Re: Thoughts on a "global" client configuration? |
Previous Message | Joel Jacobson | 2025-10-15 15:36:11 | Re: Optimize LISTEN/NOTIFY |