Re: Executing pg_createsubscriber with a non-compatible control file

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Executing pg_createsubscriber with a non-compatible control file
Date: 2025-10-15 02:17:24
Message-ID: aO8ENJ3q5bSjW-VO@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 11:54:26AM -0700, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> All patches look good to me.

Thanks. I have applied all that after a second look, not planning to
bother about the back branches for pg_createsubscriber.

We may be able to apply the version rules to more tools. pg_checksums
and pg_rewind have hardcoded requirement based on PG_VERSION_NUM. Not
sure if it's worth bothering about them, though.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aya Iwata (Fujitsu) 2025-10-15 02:48:43 RE: [PROPOSAL] Termination of Background Workers for ALTER/DROP DATABASE
Previous Message jian he 2025-10-15 01:53:12 Re: speedup COPY TO for partitioned table.