From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Fixed a typo in comment in compress_lz4.c |
Date: | 2025-10-13 23:32:56 |
Message-ID: | aO2MKJRoC7DSSlEt@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 06:08:43PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I disagree that it's not widely known. OneLook Dictionary Search [1]
> defines it correctly as "Usually means: If and only if; equivalence"
> and reports finding it in 35 of their underlying dictionaries,
> including all the usual suspects. (Some of the 35 know the military
> term "IFF: Identification Friend or Foe" rather than what we're
> after, but still that's plenty of hits.)
>
> I wonder whether adding it to our glossary would be helpful.
I think it would, it's not the first time somebody is confused by
this abbreviation. At least we would have an official reference in
the tree to be able to point to, and this term is used even by
non-native English-speaking committers (like myself) in comments,
sometimes.
(French has a version of that: "si et seulement si" or "ssi", that
I've used and seen a lot, bit only when dealing with theory in maths
or physics.)
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2025-10-13 23:40:45 | Re: Incorrect version number given to sync_pgdata() in pg_combinebackup.c |
Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2025-10-13 22:47:56 | Re: POC: enable logical decoding when wal_level = 'replica' without a server restart |