Re: anonymous unions (C11)

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: anonymous unions (C11)
Date: 2025-10-03 15:16:11
Message-ID: aN_ou5ur9ONq2wGI@nathan
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 03, 2025 at 09:01:26AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 23.09.25 16:17, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> I would have used this in the DSM registry if it was available. Patch
>> attached.
>
> This looks good to me, and also mostly harmless in terms of backpatching.

Committed, thanks for reviewing.

--
nathan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2025-10-03 15:30:36 Re: Fixing a few minor misusages of bms_union()
Previous Message Greg Burd 2025-10-03 14:56:50 Re: Fixing a few minor misusages of bms_union()