| From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: anonymous unions (C11) |
| Date: | 2025-09-23 14:17:50 |
| Message-ID: | aNKsDg0fJwqhZdXX@nathan |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 11:38:22AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> That said, I did go overboard here and converted all the struct/union
> combinations I could find, but I'm not necessarily proposing to apply
> all of them. I'm proposing patches 0001 through 0004, which are
> relatively simple or in areas that have already changed a few times
> recently (so backpatching would not be trivial anyway), and/or they
> are somewhat close to my heart because they originally motivated this
> work a long time ago. But if someone finds among the other patches
> one that they particularly like, we could add that one as well.
I would have used this in the DSM registry if it was available. Patch
attached.
--
nathan
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-C11-anonymous-unions-DSM-registry.patch | text/plain | 3.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | AIX PG user | 2025-09-23 14:26:08 | Re: AIX support |
| Previous Message | Christoph Berg | 2025-09-23 14:16:19 | Re: libcurl in libpq.pc |