From: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Add memory_limit_hits to pg_stat_replication_slots |
Date: | 2025-09-22 08:11:22 |
Message-ID: | aNEEqgDWxVeCZc6s@ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 03:24:54PM -0700, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 12:26 AM Bertrand Drouvot
> <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Looking forward to your feedback,
>
> Yes,
Thanks for looking at it!
> it's a quite different situation in two cases: spilling 100
> transactions in one ReorderBufferCheckMemoryLimit() call and spilling
> 1 transaction in each 100 ReorderBufferCheckMemoryLimit() calls, even
> though spill_txn is 100 in both cases. And we don't have any
> statistics to distinguish between these cases.
Right.
> One minor comment is:
>
> @@ -1977,6 +1978,7 @@ UpdateDecodingStats(LogicalDecodingContext *ctx)
> repSlotStat.stream_bytes = rb->streamBytes;
> repSlotStat.total_txns = rb->totalTxns;
> repSlotStat.total_bytes = rb->totalBytes;
> + repSlotStat.memory_limit_hits = rb->memory_limit_hits;
>
> Since other statistics counter names are camel cases I think it's
> better to follow that for the new counter.
Makes sense, done with memoryLimitHits in v2 attached (that's the only change
as compared with v1).
Regards,
--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v2-0001-Add-memory_limit_hits-to-pg_stat_replication_slot.patch | text/x-diff | 22.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim Jones | 2025-09-22 08:14:04 | Re: We broke the defense against accessing other sessions' temp tables |
Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2025-09-22 07:58:48 | Re: docs: Validation error with xmllint 2.15.0 |