Re: GNU/Hurd portability patches

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: GNU/Hurd portability patches
Date: 2025-09-21 22:02:25
Message-ID: aNB18ZFIXXv-FR6B@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Sep 21, 2025 at 09:00:00AM +0300, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
> So it seems to me that Hurd is not mature enough yet to test Postgres.

I'd say that it is likely not mature enough for production. In terms
of testing, that seems kind of OK. However, failures like the one you
are reporting here bring noise in the buildfarm, meaning that we would
perhaps tend to ignore reports that are in fact legit because we don't
really know what would be Hurd-related or Postgres-related. Or we
could get mixes of both.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2025-09-21 22:18:27 Re: Meson0.57.2 setup failed with option -Duuid=ossp
Previous Message Jim Jones 2025-09-21 22:02:21 Re: Add notification on BEGIN ATOMIC SQL functions using temp relations